The philosophy behind humans clothing before Civilization
Before civilizations emerged, the human natural motive to
get clothed was primarily driven by the need for protection and survival in
various environments. Here are some key factors:
- Protection from the Elements: Early humans
inhabited diverse environments with fluctuating temperatures and weather
conditions. Clothing provided essential protection against cold
temperatures, excessive heat, wind, and rain, helping to regulate body
temperature and prevent hypothermia or heatstroke.
- Safety from Physical Hazards: Clothing
served as a barrier against physical hazards such as rough terrain, sharp
objects, and insect bites. It helped to reduce injuries and abrasions,
enabling early humans to navigate their surroundings more safely.
- Camouflage and Hunting: Clothing made from
natural materials like animal hides or plant fibers could aid in
camouflage during hunting or gathering activities. This allowed early
humans to blend into their surroundings and approach prey more stealthily,
increasing their chances of success in hunting.
- Cultural
and Social Significance: Even before the development of complex
civilizations, clothing likely held cultural and social significance.
Decorative elements such as body paint, feathers, or ornaments may have
been used for self-expression, group identification, or ritualistic
purposes, fostering social cohesion and identity within communities.
- Status
and Display: In some cases, clothing may have been used to signal
status, leadership, or authority within early human groups. Certain
individuals may have worn distinctive clothing or adornments to signify
their role within the community or to display their wealth and resources.
Overall, the natural motive to get clothed before
civilizations was deeply rooted in the practical need for protection, safety,
and survival, as well as cultural, social, and possibly even symbolic
considerations within early human groups.
Nowadays!Top of
Form
The philosophy behind humans clothing themselves encompasses
various aspects, including practicality, cultural expression, social identity,
and personal comfort.
- Practicality:
Clothing serves the fundamental purpose of providing protection and warmth
against the elements. It shields the body from extreme temperatures,
sunlight, wind, and rain, enhancing human survival in diverse
environments.
- Cultural
Expression: Clothing reflects cultural values, traditions, and norms.
Different cultures have distinct styles of dress that convey identity,
status, and belonging. Traditional garments often carry symbolic meanings
and are worn during rituals, ceremonies, and celebrations.
- Social
Identity: Clothing plays a significant role in shaping social identity
and individuality. It can signal affiliation with specific groups, such as
religious communities, ethnicities, or social classes. Clothing choices
can reflect personal preferences, attitudes, and values, allowing
individuals to express themselves and assert their identity.
- Fashion
and Trends: Fashion reflects changing aesthetic preferences and trends
in society. Clothing styles evolve over time, influenced by factors such
as technological advancements, globalization, and cultural exchange.
Fashion serves as a form of creative expression and self-presentation,
allowing individuals to experiment with different looks and styles.
- Psychological
Comfort: Clothing can contribute to psychological well-being by
enhancing self-confidence, body image, and overall comfort. Wearing
clothing that fits well and reflects personal style can boost self-esteem
and foster a sense of empowerment.
In essence, the philosophy behind humans clothing themselves
encompasses a combination of practical, cultural, social, and personal factors,
highlighting the multifaceted nature of clothing in human life and society.
Please notice that three main reasons disappeared which are:
1. Protection from the Elements
2. Safety
from Physical Hazards
3. Camouflage
and Hunting
Please keep in mind that the laws of evolution:
“The less fit are eliminated; the fittest survive”
According to The United Nations:
“Approximately 3.5 million people die each year due to
inadequate water supply, sanitation and hygiene.”
THEY COULDN’T FIT …..!
To read the full article here is the link and you will
find it on description:
https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/world-water-day-reminds-us-value-precious-resource#:~:text=Approximately%203.5%20million%20people%20die,water%20for%20all%20by%202030.
According to European Parliament:
Textile production
is estimated to be responsible for about 20% of global clean water pollution
from dyeing and finishing products. A single laundry load of polyester clothes
can discharge 700,000 microplastic fibers that can end up in the food chain.
To read the full
article here is the link and you will find it on description:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20201208STO93327/the-impact-of-textile-production-and-waste-on-the-environment-infographics#:~:text=Textile%20production%20is%20estimated%20to,up%20in%20the%20food%20chain.
Impact of
textile dyeing and printing
The severe impact
of textile dyeing and printing waste on the environment does pose a challenge
to the traditional philosophy behind human clothing. While clothing
historically served essential functions related to protection, survival, and
social expression, the environmental consequences of modern textile production
raise ethical and sustainability concerns that contradict these principles.
Here's how:
- Protection and Survival: While
clothing continues to provide physical protection and comfort, the environmental
degradation caused by textile dyeing and printing waste threatens the very
ecosystems that sustain human life. Pollution of waterways, soil
contamination, and resource depletion associated with textile production
undermine the long-term viability of these natural systems, ultimately
compromising human well-being and survival.
- Social Expression and Identity:
Clothing has long been used as a form of cultural expression and identity.
However, the environmental impacts of textile production challenge the
ethical implications of fashion consumption. As consumers become more
aware of the environmental and social costs of fast fashion and textile
waste, there is a growing movement towards sustainable and ethical
clothing choices that prioritize environmental stewardship and social
responsibility.
- Resource Consumption and Waste:
The philosophy behind human clothing historically emphasized the efficient
use of natural resources and materials. However, modern textile production
is characterized by high resource consumption, including water, energy,
and chemicals, as well as significant waste generation. This contradicts
the principles of sustainability and responsible resource management
inherent in traditional clothing practices.
In summary, while
the philosophy behind human clothing has traditionally focused on protection,
expression, and resource efficiency, the environmental impact of modern textile
production challenges these principles. To reconcile these contradictions,
there is a growing need for innovation, sustainable practices, and consumer
awareness to promote clothing that aligns with ethical and environmental
values.
Top of Form
Let’s ask our
selves this question:
In nature, what color is the most warning to prey? What color is most
attractive to a predator?
In nature, bright
and conspicuous colors such as red, orange, and yellow are often associated
with warning signals to prey. These colors signal danger or toxicity, serving
as a visual deterrent to potential predators. This phenomenon is known as
aposematism, where prey animals advertise their unpalatability or defensive
capabilities through coloration.
Conversely,
predators are often attracted to colors that help them blend into their
surroundings or provide camouflage for hunting. Earthy tones such as brown,
gray, and green are common among predators, allowing them to conceal themselves
and approach prey unnoticed. This camouflage helps predators remain undetected
while stalking or ambushing their quarry.
It's important to
note that these color associations can vary across different species and
environments, as natural selection shapes the visual signals and adaptations of
both predators and prey in response to their specific ecological niches and
evolutionary pressures.
Top of Form
Let’s imagine that:
The prey and predator have the capacity to change their color and prey choses
colors that makes them easily recognized and attracted by the predators and
predator choses colors that makes them easily recognized? What will be the
consequences?
If both prey and predators were to deliberately choose
colors that make them easily recognized by each other, it could lead to
significant ecological consequences, including:
- Increased
Predation: Prey animals that deliberately choose conspicuous colors
may inadvertently attract more predators, making them more vulnerable to
predation. This could result in higher rates of predation and population
decline among prey species.
- Disruption
of Predator-Prey Dynamics: Deliberately choosing recognizable colors
could disrupt the natural balance between predators and prey. If predators
can easily locate and capture prey, it may lead to a decrease in predator
populations due to overconsumption of prey resources. Conversely, if prey
populations decline, predators may face food shortages and population
declines as well.
- Evolutionary
Pressures: Over time, the deliberate selection of conspicuous colors
by both predators and prey could exert strong evolutionary pressures on
both populations. Prey species may evolve defensive mechanisms to
compensate for increased predation risk, such as developing toxins or
evolving faster running speeds. Predators, in turn, may evolve more
efficient hunting strategies or alternative prey preferences to adapt to
changes in prey coloration.
- Cascading
Effects on Ecosystems: Changes in predator-prey dynamics can have
cascading effects throughout entire ecosystems. Population fluctuations in
one species can impact the abundance and distribution of other species
within the food web, leading to complex ecological interactions and
potential shifts in community structure.
Overall, deliberate selection of easily recognizable colors
by both predators and prey could disrupt natural ecological processes and lead
to widespread consequences for biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and
evolutionary trajectories.
Conclusion and Comment
From my professional perspective as a textile wet processing
expert and a proponent of water and environmental conservation, it is evident
that persisting with traditional methods of textile dyeing and printing solely
to meet fashion demands, without considering the fundamental purpose of
clothing to adapt and survive within nature, poses significant ecological
risks.
In this case we look like prey and predator choosing the
wrong way of coloring themselves!
In the face of other polluting industries and climate
change, such practices resemble the behaviors of prey and predators selecting
attractive colors for fashion, disregarding the primary evolutionary purpose of
coloration for survival. This approach accelerates the disruption of natural
ecological processes, leading to far-reaching consequences for biodiversity,
ecosystem stability, and evolutionary pathways. Ultimately, such actions may
trigger a natural reformation with destructive implications, potentially beyond
our ability to mitigate, resulting in significant population losses.
When considering the collective impact of various polluting
industries, climate change, and other environmental stressors, the analogy of a
"time tsunami" becomes more apt. Just as a tsunami is characterized
by a sudden and overwhelming force, a "time tsunami" describes the
cumulative and accelerating effects of human activities on the environment over
time.
This concept emphasizes the interconnectedness of various
environmental stressors and their compounding impacts on ecosystems,
biodiversity, and human well-being. Like a tsunami, the "time
tsunami" represents a powerful and destructive force that can reshape
landscapes, alter ecosystems, and threaten the stability of natural systems.
The strength of this metaphor lies in its ability to convey
the urgency and magnitude of the environmental challenges we face. By
recognizing the interconnected nature of environmental issues and their
cumulative effects, we can better understand the need for collective action to
address root causes and mitigate the impacts of human activities on the planet.
In summary, the "time tsunami" analogy underscores
the critical importance of addressing environmental degradation, pollution, and
climate change to safeguard the health and resilience of our planet for future
generations.
